Recently, Luckin Coffee has once again become the focus of public attention due to an incident involving the refusal of cash. A customer in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, insisted on using cash to buy coffee at a store, but was told by the staff that orders could only be placed through the app or mini-program, and the transaction was only completed after police mediation. This is not the first time Luckin Coffee has made the news over cash payment issues; there have been similar reports before. Today, with the widespread use of mobile payments, can merchants refuse cash? And how should consumers protect their own rights? This article will recount the incident and explore the legal and consumer experience issues behind it. [more…]

Recently, a Reddit post about Luckin Coffee's New York store refusing to accept cash payments sparked heated discussion. The poster claimed that the staff argued Luckin is a tech company rather than a coffee company, and therefore is not bound by local regulations requiring food retail businesses to accept cash, and the person involved called 311 on the spot to file a complaint. Both of Luckin's New York stores use a cashless system, supporting only the official App or online payments such as Apple Pay and PayPal. Some netizens worry that this practice is out of step with local consumption habits and may also raise privacy concerns, but others believe that Luckin's stores are merely pickup points for online orders and may not necessarily constitute a violation of the law. Front Street Coffee will continue to follow the developments of this incident. [more…]

Near closing time, the coffee machine has already been cleaned, and at that moment a customer walks in through the door asking if they can have a cup of coffee—such a scene is not uncommon in the coffee industry. Recently, some consumers have reported that they arrived at a coffee shop before the end of business hours to place an order but were refused, with staff saying that the store had already cut off orders early and that the coffee machine would not be turned back on after cleaning. The incident sparked heated discussion online: one side believes that customers should be served during business hours, while the other side sympathizes with coffee workers who do not want to work overtime. How should coffee shops balance service and operations? And how should similar situations be handled properly? This article compiles views from various parties for the reference of coffee enthusiasts. [more…]

In recent years, the grab-and-go consumption model has become increasingly popular, and many food and beverage brands have opened "drive-thru" lanes for this purpose. However, a cycling enthusiast was refused service at a Costa store in Scotland, on the grounds of "not being in a motor vehicle." This is not the first time Costa has sparked controversy over a similar incident. An almost identical situation occurred in 2020, when Costa explained that bicycles are not taxed or insured in the same way as motor vehicles, and was immediately rebutted by the British Cycling Federation. Behind the incident lies the delicate balance between convenience and fairness in drive-thru service. Front Street Coffee takes you through this hotly debated incident. [more…]

These days, walking into many tea shops, ordering a drink directly from the staff seems to be getting harder and harder—scanning a QR code, registering, and ordering online have become the standard process. Recently, a netizen shared an experience of being refused when trying to order directly at the counter because they were feeling unwell, sparking widespread discussion. Some people agree that ordering by scanning the code is efficient and saves time, while others question why on-site ordering is still not allowed when there are no other customers. Tea shop employees revealed that factors such as not being equipped with a cash register system, difficulty making change for cash, and insufficient staffing make QR code ordering a helpless choice for most stores. This debate over ordering methods reflects the difficult balance between efficiency and humanized service. [more…]

Recently, a consumer reported on social media that when they went to a Heytea store with 50 yuan in cash to buy a drink, a staff member told them they could not make change and suggested switching to online ordering. This experience quickly sparked widespread discussion, and many tea beverage industry practitioners chimed in, saying that insufficient small change reserves at stores are indeed a common phenomenon, especially during peak customer flow at mall locations, where staff often have no time to go out and exchange for small bills. However, some voices pointed out that the difficulty of making change should not be shifted onto customers, and merchants should ensure that all legitimate payment methods remain accessible. This is not the first time Heytea has been criticized over cash payment issues, and this incident has once again pushed the cash management problems of chain tea beverage brands into the spotlight. [more…]

On a scorching summer day, iced drinks become the top sellers at beverage shops everywhere, yet the debate over "can you order it without ice" never dies down. A customer ordered an iced drink at Manner, noting that they only wanted two ice cubes, but after receiving it still found the temperature too low and asked the staff to remove the ice, only to be refused. The staff member helplessly explained that iced drinks must be made according to the standard ratio, and that removing ice without authorization would result in a pay deduction if caught on camera. Similar situations have occurred at Starbucks. Why are chain brands so "particular" about the amount of ice? And how should baristas choose between customer needs and company rules? This article will guide you through the industry logic behind the controversy over removing ice from iced drinks. [more…]

Recently, a customer in Guizhou, unable to find the store for a self-pickup order, demanded delivery instead. When refused, they went to the shop and poured coffee over the bar counter. The incident, reported by multiple media outlets, sparked widespread discussion. The barista, working alone, could not leave the store to deliver, while the customer vented frustration through harassing phone calls and pouring coffee. Netizens generally agreed the barista's actions were understandable and the customer's behavior was excessive. The shop involved did not call the police, and employees cleaned up themselves. Front Street Coffee reminds that self-pickup orders can be handled via errand services, and only civilized communication can resolve conflicts. [more…]

Recently, a young woman entered a coffee shop with large luggage and occupied multiple tables and chairs to rest for as long as four hours without making any purchase. After repeated unsuccessful attempts to persuade her, the staff called the police. When the police arrived, the woman refused to cooperate and was eventually forcibly removed and taken to the hospital. The incident has sparked discussion about the operating order of coffee shops and customer codes of conduct. Front Street Coffee reminds everyone that civilized consumption is a basic obligation every customer should fulfill. [more…]

Recently, a woman in Ontario, Canada, was refused service when she tried to pay with an old version of the 5 Canadian dollar banknote issued in 1986 at a coffee shop, sparking attention. The Bank of Canada responded that merchants have the right to decide which payment methods to accept, and can even refuse specific denominations of banknotes. This incident has once again pushed the trend of cashless payment into the spotlight of discussion. Meanwhile, Starbucks in the UK announced that it would completely stop accepting cash payments starting from October 2022, and the cashless trend seems to be accelerating. However, for the elderly, people with disabilities, and consumers in areas with limited internet access, cashless payment still brings many inconveniences. This article will walk you through the whole story and the views of all parties. [more…]

Recently, a post about a Luckin Coffee store refusing to provide ice to a customer for her child to use as a cold compress to reduce swelling sparked widespread discussion online. The customer, whose child had suffered a head injury and urgently needed ice, was politely declined by staff citing company policy, and was suggested to seek help at the KFC across the street. Behind this incident lies the dilemma that chain beverage brands face between food safety control and customers' emergency needs. Luckin employees revealed that the rule against providing ice separately stems from a previous incident in which someone sent store ice for testing, triggering an economic dispute. Since then, bar-counter surveillance has been monitoring in real time, and those who violate the rule may face bonus deductions. However, when customers face special emergencies, should there be room for flexibility? Front Street Coffee takes you into an in-depth discussion of this topic. [more…]

A Starbucks customer was shocked and concerned about food safety after discovering multiple yellow raised bumps, suspected to be pustules, on the surface of the beef slices in a sandwich she ordered through a third-party platform. She immediately contacted the store to demand an explanation and a refund, and filed a complaint with 12345. Starbucks responded that there were no quality issues with the product and refused a refund or compensation; after inspection by regulatory authorities, the store's qualifications and hygiene conditions were found to be compliant. Ultimately, because the order came from a third-party platform, the platform refunded the order amount. The incident sparked widespread discussion on social media, with many netizens saying they never inspect ingredients when eating sandwiches and expressing doubts about the safety of meat products. So, is it actually normal for yellow granules to appear on the surface of cooked beef? Currently, opinions online vary, and there is no definitive conclusion. [more…]

Recently, a franchise store of the South Korean coffee chain The Venti was exposed for a serious food hygiene issue: after filing calluses on their feet inside the store, the manager did not change gloves or wash hands and directly made drinks for customers. After witnessing the entire process, the consumer took photos as evidence and called the head office to demand a refund, but was refused. The incident quickly spread online, sparking widespread attention and heated discussion. The Venti subsequently issued a formal apology on its official website and promised to strengthen hygiene training. This "foot callus coffee" incident not only made consumers feel uncomfortable, but also triggered deep public reflection on hygiene management in the food and beverage industry. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop in Taiwan experienced a dispute triggered by a customer who had been freeloading on electricity for a long time and refused to make a purchase. This customer was a regular at the shop, visiting multiple times to charge their phone and watch dramas with the sound on, yet never bought anything. After repeated unsuccessful attempts to persuade them, the staff chose to call the police. When the police arrived and tried to persuade the customer to leave, they also met with refusal, ultimately leading to the customer being handcuffed and taken away as a "thief caught in the act." Surprisingly, the customer returned to the same coffee shop the very next day, demanding access to the surveillance footage of the incident and presenting a medical report to accuse the shop and the police. The shop stated that the matter has been handed over to the judicial authorities. This incident has sparked discussions about the boundaries of coffee shop operations and customer behavior. [more…]

Heytea's publicly posted "remake if unsatisfied" service commitment has recently sparked a string of consumer doubts. Some customers report being refused by staff when asking for a remake because a drink was sweeter than expected, with customer service responding that drinks must be "made to the original standard." Similar cases have also occurred in Shandong. Some long-time customers point out that there are differences in how the standard is applied between directly operated stores and franchise stores. Consumers generally believe that if a brand makes a public commitment, it should not attach hidden conditions. This article reviews the course of events and the views of all parties, and compares the practices of peers such as Starbucks and Chagee to explore how "remake if unsatisfied" should actually be implemented. [more…]

In recent years, the trend of professional venue visits and commercial shoots has grown increasingly intense, forcing many cafés to publicly declare their refusal of unpaid commercial photography and venue-visit behavior. What was originally a mutually beneficial relationship between visit bloggers and businesses has now soured due to tactics such as false promotion by some individuals, using follower counts to extort free items, and malicious negative reviews. Some even go so far as to occupy public space for extended photo shoots with bags of equipment after purchasing only a single drink, seriously disrupting other customers' experience. Café owners, suffering immensely from these chaotic practices, have posted notices one after another to protect their in-store environment. This article will explore in depth the causes of this phenomenon, the real experiences of café owners, and their efforts to safeguard the peaceful atmosphere of their cafés. [more…]

When ordering at a coffee shop, many customers are in the habit of writing personalized requests in the remarks section, from no ice or less ice to adjusting the number of syrup pumps, and these operations are still manageable for baristas. However, when the remarks escalate into requests to add extra ingredients outside the recipe, even down to precise milliliters and spoon counts, coffee workers find themselves in a dilemma. On the one hand, they worry that refusing will lead to a bad review; on the other, they face accountability pressure from material loss. This contradiction is especially prominent in chain brands with strict material controls. This article will take an in-depth look at the real dilemma behind this phenomenon and present the true voices of baristas. [more…]

Nowadays, it has become the norm to check review platforms before going out to spend money, and high ratings and bad reviews often sway people's choices. However, the review system can also be exploited by people with ulterior motives. Recently, a coffee shop owner revealed that because they refused a customer's request to do commercial photography inside the shop, they were anonymously given a 0.5-star bad review, and were even accused of having something dirty in the coffee. After checking the surveillance footage, the owner discovered that the so-called foreign object had actually been placed into the cup by the customer for a staged photo. After the incident came to light, it sparked heated discussion among netizens, with many lamenting how difficult it is for businesses to defend their rights, once again bringing the topic of coffee shops refusing commercial photography into the spotlight. [more…]

Recently, the Shanghai Cyberspace Administration found during a follow-up inspection that six coffee companies—Luckin, Mstand, COSTA, Pacific Coffee, Nowwa, and Yichi Garden—have still not effectively implemented the requirements of the Personal Information Protection Law, and have problems with illegally collecting consumer information, and were therefore summoned for talks again. This is another concentrated action following the legal education training in May this year for 24 brands including Starbucks and Luckin. A reporter's test found that if users refuse to provide permissions such as precise location, some brands' mini-programs cannot place orders normally. The regulatory authorities said they will continue to carry out "look back" inspections and will file cases, impose penalties, and publicly expose companies that repeatedly refuse to correct their ways. While enjoying the convenience of coffee, consumers also need to pay attention to their own privacy and security. [more…]

Recently, a surveillance video from a Luckin Coffee store in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, has gone viral online. The video shows a customer who, after waiting 25 minutes, demanded that the staff prioritize making their drink. When refused, the customer lost control of their emotions and verbally attacked the staff, even mocking their education and appearance. Unexpectedly, the two employees remained calm and restrained throughout, responding with a composed attitude. The incident sparked widespread discussion among netizens, with many praising the employees' professionalism, while others suggested the brand should give them a "grievance award." The employees involved said they have called the police, hoping to make more people realize that insulting others comes at a cost. [more…]